The People v. Stephen Pellegrino
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Term should be affirmed.
A guilty plea is not invalid solely because the trial court failed to recite a defendant’s constitutional rights under Boykin v Alabama (395 US 238 [1969]; see People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375 [2015] [decided herewith]). The record as a whole, however, must affirmatively demonstrate that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived those rights (see People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 17 [1983]).
*1064The Appellate Term correctly concluded that the record in this case affirmatively shows a knowing, intelligent and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- The People v. Joseph Conceicao / The People v. Federico Perez / The People v. Javier SanchezNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. PerrellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. Guevara-LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. Pil-Yong YooAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- People v. SantosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.