Legal Opinion

The People v. Stephen Pellegrino

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 2015No. 209 SSM 26PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Term should be affirmed.

A guilty plea is not invalid solely because the trial court failed to recite a defendant’s constitutional rights under Boykin v Alabama (395 US 238 [1969]; see People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375 [2015] [decided herewith]). The record as a whole, however, must affirmatively demonstrate that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived those rights (see People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 17 [1983]).

*1064The Appellate Term correctly concluded that the record in this case affirmatively shows a knowing, intelligent and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. The People v. Joseph Conceicao / The People v. Federico Perez / The People v. Javier SanchezNew York Court of Appeals · 2015

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. People v. PerrellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  3. People v. Guevara-LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  4. People v. Pil-Yong YooAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  5. People v. SantosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API