Tidd v. Stull
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.
This is an action to recover for services rendered as an attorney. Defendant admitted the employment of plaintiff in three different actions, and alleged that in two of them the amount of attorney’s fees had been agreed upon and fully paid; that in the third case plaintiff commenced and was to carry to final determination an action, but withdrew before the trial and, therefore, was entitled to no fee in that case. Defendant also filed a cross-bill in which he *507alleged that he had paid to plaintiff certain specified sums for expenses, and that plaintiff had not incurred expenses to the amount…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Blanchard v. LawsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
- Fleming Realty & Ins., Inc. v. EvansNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
- Harrell v. People's City Mission HomeNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
- Grimminger v. CummingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
- Dunn v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.