Legal Opinion

Acheson v. Murata

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 2, 1952No. 422PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment is vacated and the ease is remanded to the District Court for specific findings as to the circumstances attending appellee’s service in the Japanese Army and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom.

Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion the judgment should be affirmed. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that the findings are adequate to show that the services of appellee to Japan were rendered under the compulsion of militáry and other sanctions, evidenced in some instances by physical beatings, dissents to vacation and remand.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nishikawa v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Acheson, Secretary of State v. MaenzaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  3. Hisao Murata v. AchesonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1953
  4. SBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1958
  5. AMICOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API