Legal Opinion · Dissent

Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. O'Donohoe

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 20, 1988No. 87-1760Published

1DissentHarris, Justice

I respectfully dissent from the majority selection of a sanction. It seems inescapable to me that the respondent deliberately attempted to mislead her clients’ creditors by notarizing a document with the wrong date. The record is clear that she believed at the time that the date was critical to her clients’ rights and to those of their creditors. On this record I cannot believe the incorrect date was placed there in error.

I disagree that the facts here square with those in Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Roberts, 312 N.W.2d 556 (Iowa 1981). In Roberts the misconduct was serious…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. HurdSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct v. RobertsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API