Woods v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACKSON, Commissioner.
Appellant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle on a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $500 and confinement in the county jail for 30 days.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not questioned and need not be recited here.
The first ground of error urged by appellant is that the complaint on which the information was based was defective because it failed to recite that the affiant was a credible person.
Art. 21.22, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., provides that:
“No information shall be presented until affidavit has been made by some credible person…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
- French v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Larocca v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Rawlinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Ashley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Annis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Crawford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1982
- Rangel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Luis Limones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018