State v. Schleiger (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
{¶ 1} The Twelfth District Court of Appeals certified the following conflict question for resolution: “Whether a defendant is entitled to counsel when a trial court conducts a resentencing hearing for the purpose of imposing statutorily mandated post-release control.” We accepted the conflict and one proposition of law from Curtis D. Schleiger’s discretionary appeal: “A defendant has the right to counsel at a felony resentencing hearing regardless of the scope of the hearing.”
{¶ 2} We answer the certified question in the affirmative because a resentenc-ing hearing is a critical stage of a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- State v. Davis (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. Hackett (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. BodeOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- State BanksOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. OttOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.