Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. Mendolia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 27, 1986PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage, etc., plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a “revised” judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Berman, J.), entered August 1, 1983, as dismissed the personal injury claim of plaintiff Margarita Ortiz and the collateral claim of plaintiff Pedro Ortiz for loss of spousal services, after a jury trial at which defendants conceded liability but the jury answered in the negative to three specific interrogatories pertaining to the no-fault insurance threshold of serious physical…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kirschhoffer v. Van DykeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Panzarino v. CarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Barkley v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
  4. Mihileas v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Schaming v. Saunders Construction CarriersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API