Feazell v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Appellant’s motion to withdraw plea post-sentencing in this case was untimely filed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l) (motion must be filed within thirty days of date sentence rendered). As a result, the trial eourt never had jurisdiction to rule on the merits of the motion. Bermudez v. State, 901 So.2d 981, 984 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); see also Golden v. State, 84 So.3d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); James v. State, 12 So.3d 1290 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); McKnight v. State, 964 So.2d 803, 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Dayton v. State, 867 So.2d 647 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). On remand, the order denying appellant’s motion…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bermudez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Golden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- McKnight v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Dayton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- James v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
3Cited by1 opinion
- 2D15-1642 / Sanders v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016