Legal Opinion

Feazell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 5, 2013No. 4D12-2714PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant’s motion to withdraw plea post-sentencing in this case was untimely filed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l) (motion must be filed within thirty days of date sentence rendered). As a result, the trial eourt never had jurisdiction to rule on the merits of the motion. Bermudez v. State, 901 So.2d 981, 984 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); see also Golden v. State, 84 So.3d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); James v. State, 12 So.3d 1290 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); McKnight v. State, 964 So.2d 803, 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Dayton v. State, 867 So.2d 647 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). On remand, the order denying appellant’s motion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bermudez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. Golden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. McKnight v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  4. Dayton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  5. James v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 2D15-1642 / Sanders v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API