Coleman v. State

In a petition for post-conviction relief, David Coleman challenged his 1989 convictions for second degree robbery and the fraudulent use of a credit card. The district attorney filed a response alleging:

"THAT the Petition is not sufficiently specific, as required by Rule 20.6(b) of the Temporary Rules of Criminal Procedure, is precluded by Rule 20.2 of said rules; and is due to be denied on grounds of preclusion as provided by Rule 20.2. Further, that no grounds exist which would entitle the Petitioner to relief under Rule 20, Temporary Rules of Criminal Procedure, and no purpose would be…