Legal Opinion
William Pfaff and Patrick Pfaff v. Gene Wells, Sheriff of Oklahoma County, State of Oklahoma
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 6, 1981No. 80-2102PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir. R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
After exhausting their state remedies the petitioners-appellants William and Patrick Pfaff brought this habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 seeking to bar their extradition to the State of Michigan to begin serving sentences after their convictions in that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sweeney v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Leonard R. Cherek v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Royal Russell Long v. Duane ShillingerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Bolante v. KeislerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Parks v. BourbeauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Stepney v. LopesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.