Legal Opinion

Thoma v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided July 1, 1907Published

1Opinion of the CourtHosea, J.

*111Heard on motion for a new trial.

The argument in favor of the motion for a new trial seems to ignore the status of the case as it finally reached the jury. The original pleadings presented a case of damages for deprivation of a property right namely, plaintiff’s right of drainage into Lick Run. As the testimony progressed, it clearly appeare'd that this could not be maintained upon the facts charged, namely, the building of a sewer in the bed of Lick Run. The trial was allowed to proceed, however, upon an amendment to the' petition converting the issue into one for the maintenance by the city…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. . the United States Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Hibbard v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  3. Damour v. Lyons CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  4. Brazier v. ClapMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  5. Alsop v. MagillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1809

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API