Hair v. City of Norman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
Plaintiff brought this action against the defendant city, its city manager and individual members of its governing body, said individual members being nominal parties only, for injunctive relief to bar defendants from entering upon a tract of land claimed by him and from removing fences placed thereon by plaintiff. The city, its members and the city manager will hereafter be designated as defendant.
The defendant answered denying generally the allegations set forth in the petition of the plaintiff, and in its cross-petition set up its ownership of the land in question, claimed adverse…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Flesher v. CallahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Tucker v. HankeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
- Manville v. GronnigerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Gildehaus v. WhitingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Fessler v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gache v. Town of Harrison, NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- AMOORPOUR v. KIRKHAMSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023