Legal Opinion

Hair v. City of Norman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 17, 1963No. 40224PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff brought this action against the defendant city, its city manager and individual members of its governing body, said individual members being nominal parties only, for injunctive relief to bar defendants from entering upon a tract of land claimed by him and from removing fences placed thereon by plaintiff. The city, its members and the city manager will hereafter be designated as defendant.

The defendant answered denying generally the allegations set forth in the petition of the plaintiff, and in its cross-petition set up its ownership of the land in question, claimed adverse…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Flesher v. CallahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Tucker v. HankeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  3. Manville v. GronnigerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  4. Gildehaus v. WhitingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  5. Fessler v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gache v. Town of Harrison, NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  2. AMOORPOUR v. KIRKHAMSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API