Legal Opinion
Williams v. Vermont
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 4, 1985No. 84-592Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
472 U.S. 14 (1985)
WILLIAMS ET AL.
v.
VERMONT ET AL.
No. 84-592.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 19, 1985
Decided June 4, 1985
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF VERMONT
Norman Williams argued the cause pro se and filed briefs for appellants.
Andrew M. Eschen, Assistant Attorney General of Vermont, argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief was Jeffrey L. Amestoy, Attorney General.
2Opinion of the Court · WhiteJustice White
The State of Vermont collects a use tax when cars are registered with it. The tax is not imposed if the car was purchased in Vermont and a sales tax has been paid. The tax is also reduced by the amount…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
3Cases cited25 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Regan v. Taxation With Representation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.