Edwards v. Prendergast
New York Supreme Court
Mandamus by one Edwards against William A. Prendergast, as Comptroller of the City of New York.
1Opinion of the CourtKelby, J.
The relator applies for a peremptory writ of mandamus directing the comptroller to pay him $522.20 awarded him by an order of the Supreme Court as compensation for services and for personal and incidental expenses in a homicide defense. The question is only as to $22.20, which relator paid for the stenographer’s minutes before the city *400magistrate on the commitment of the accused, and for the minutes of the testimony of a particular witness, jointly indicted with his client, but separately tried.
I do not think the statutory term, “ personal and incidental expenses,” is to be limited merely, as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People ex rel. Levy v. GroutNew York Supreme Court · 1902
- In re MonfortAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Moynahan v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- In re MonfortAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903