Legal Opinion
United States v. Eastman
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 28, 1981No. Civ. No. 75-1158 MEPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
JAMES M. BURNS, Chief Judge.
The issue in this condemnation case is the amount of compensation to be awarded the Eastmans for their land located near the Lost Creek reservoir on the upper Rogue River. The property is about 35 miles northeast of Medford. It consists of 225 acres with a generally south to north downward slope, lying south of the Rogue River a distance of approximately Vfe to one mile.
In 1970 the government acquired all of one Eastman tract (approximately 440 acres) plus approximately one-third of the subject tract (110 acres). Subsequently, the government…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. EastmanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1981
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. EastmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. EastmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States of America v. 0.1785 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Chesapeake Virginia, and MSF Investors II, LLC, et al.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2026
- United States v. 80,794 Square Feet of Land, More or Less, Situated in the City of Harrisburg, Dauphin County, Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021