Legal Opinion
Millbrooks v. PYLE, JUDGE, ETC.
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1954No. 0-369PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner seeks an alternative writ of mandamus. The action is not brought in the name of the State of Indiana, nor does the petition comply with Rule 2-35 as to certified copies of the lower court records. See State ex rel. Ketchum v. Marshall (1952), 231 Ind. 70, 106 N. E. 2d 796.
Petition denied.
Note. — Reported in 120 N. E. 2d 175.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Ketchum v. MarshallIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Woodson v. CrissIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
3Cited by2 opinions
- McGill v. RabbIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- Spangler v. DailyIndiana Supreme Court · 1958