Legal Opinion

Martin v. de Coppet

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.

1Opinion of the CourtGeigerich, J.

The aetion is to foreclose a mechanic’s lien against the premises known as No. 754 Park avenue, in the borough of Manhattan, New York city, of which the defendant Laura Eawcett de Coppet is the owner. Charles Gilpin is the principal contractor, and all the liens involved in the action are for labor and materials furnished to him by subcontractors. Gilpin was adjudged a bankrupt on February 26, 1906, two days before any of the notices of lien in suit was filed, and the defendant Louis Wagner was thereafter appointed his trustee in bankruptcy. The plaintiff is the assignee of two lienors, viz.,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. D. G. Burton Co. v. CowanNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  2. H.B.C. Co. v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Freese v. AveryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. Kelsey v. RourkeNew York Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Cattaberry v. KnoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lycee Francais v. CalagnaNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Assay Partners v. Econowatt Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Furze v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Gately v. GatelyNew York Supreme Court · 1918
  5. O'Neill v. Seglin Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API