Reynolds v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Saunders county. Tried below before Marshall, J. cited: Clark v. Fislm’, 1 Paige Ch. (N. Y.), 171 [19 Am. Dec., 402]; Obis v. Thom, 23 Ala., 469 [58 Am. Dec., 303]; Smith v. State, 55 Ala., 1; Cook v. State, 4 Zab. (N. J.), 852; Van Zandt v. Ins. Co., 55 N. Y., 179; Conners v. State, 47 Wis., 523.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
An information was filed against the plaintiff in error in the district court of Saunders county charging him with the crime of rape and on the trial he was found guilty and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for four years. A large number of errors are assigned in this court, most of which it is unnecessary to notice. The evidence of the prosecuting witness was received through the aid of an interpreter, and while it may be true in its principal features the examination was conducted in such a manner as practically to put words in the witness’s mouth. No objection seems to have…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. AbbotNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Mathews v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Don Moran v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Oleson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
- State v. BurgdorfSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. ChampagneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. GriffinWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Cascio v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. ClevengerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
- German-American Insurance v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.