Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Brooklyn Trust Co.

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided August 10, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGarey, S.

The motion of the United States Attorney General, as successor to the Alien Property Custodian, to strike out the appearances of the parties, whose interests in the estate were vested by the Alien Property Custodian in accordance with the Trading with the Enemy Act (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 1 et seg.), is denied. The parties were cited according to the usual practice of the court and, although their interests have vested in the Alien Property Custodian under his vesting order, they are proper parties although they may not be necessary parties to the proceeding.

The court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of SchultzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of Brooklyn Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1955
  2. In re the Accounting of Brooklyn Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API