Legal Opinion

Ament v. Church of Annunciation of Elma

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 4, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3). Defendant failed to “indicate in some detail” the testimony that the witnesses expected to be called would give and offered only vague assertions concerning the court calendars in the counties involved (Rodriguez v St. Paul’s Catholic Church, 162 AD2d 1017; see, Abbadonza v Brown, 186 AD2d 1011; Schapiro & Reich v Fuchsberg, 172 AD2d 1080). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — Venue.)

Present — Denman, P. J., Green,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. St. Paul's Catholic ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Schapiro & Reich v. FuchsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Abbadonza v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stratton v. DueppengiesserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Kessler v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API