Legal Opinion
Arechiga v. Housing Authority of City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 24, 1958No. Civ. 22714PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.
Plaintiffs were among the many property owners who were defendants in Housing Authority v. Lopez, which was an action initiated in 1951 to condemn property in the city of Los Angeles for a low rental housing project. The issue of necessity was litigated in that action, which resulted in a judgment for the Housing Authority in March, 1953, fixing the value of the property here in question at $10,050. No appeal was taken by the Arechigas and that judgment in due course became final. The amount of the award was deposited with the county clerk by the Housing Authority. The Arechigas, however, did…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Reichelderfer v. QuinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Wright v. WalcottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Parish of Jefferson v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Skelly Oil Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- Valentine v. LamontSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lavine v. JessupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Hayward Union High School District v. MadridCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Newport v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Carl Beistline v. City of San Diego and General Dynamics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Olsen v. BD. OF ED. OF GRANITE SCH. DIST.Utah Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.