Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Segal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 14, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered December 30, 1999, inter alia, awarding plaintiffs use and occupancy against defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*75Plaintiffs are entitled to use and occupancy for the entire period that no rent was demanded or paid. Although defendants had occupied the apartment for several years before plaintiffs finally realized that they were not billing defendants and demanded payment of rent, the record amply supports the trial court’s finding that plaintiffs did not waive payment of rent (see, Jefpaul Garage Corp. v…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jefpaul Garage Corp. v. Presbyterian HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Levinson v. 390 West End Associates, L.L.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. 425 Third Avenue Realty Co. v. GreenfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC and Sears Holdings CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API