Riemer Bros., Inc. v. Marlis Constr. Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SEIDENFELD
delivered the opinion of the court:
This is the second appeal based upon the meaning of the language in an earth moving contract:
“Import, grade and compact clay fill *2.75 cu yd.”
In the original suit filed by the fill contractor the trial court in a bench trial awarded Riemer Bros. *20,809.24 as the balance due, a judgment which we reversed on appeal and remanded for a new trial. (Riemer Bros., Inc. v. Marlis Construction Co., 37 Ill. App. 3d 842 (1976).) Following a bench trial on remand judgment was entered in favor of Riemer Bros, for *26,386.25 and the land…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brown v. ZimmermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Weiland Tool & Manufacturing Co. v. WhitneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
- Schneider v. NeubertIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
- Harris v. American General Finance Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Bost v. Paulson's Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Monotronics Corp. v. BaylorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Althoff Industries, Inc. v. Elgin Medical Center, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Quaker Alloy Casting Co. v. Gulfco Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Johnson v. FlueckigerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Smith v. JohnstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.