Legal Opinion

Riemer Bros., Inc. v. Marlis Constr. Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 14, 1978No. 77-152PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SEIDENFELD

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is the second appeal based upon the meaning of the language in an earth moving contract:

“Import, grade and compact clay fill *2.75 cu yd.”

In the original suit filed by the fill contractor the trial court in a bench trial awarded Riemer Bros. *20,809.24 as the balance due, a judgment which we reversed on appeal and remanded for a new trial. (Riemer Bros., Inc. v. Marlis Construction Co., 37 Ill. App. 3d 842 (1976).) Following a bench trial on remand judgment was entered in favor of Riemer Bros, for *26,386.25 and the land…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown v. ZimmermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Weiland Tool & Manufacturing Co. v. WhitneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Schneider v. NeubertIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Harris v. American General Finance Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Bost v. Paulson's Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Monotronics Corp. v. BaylorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  2. Althoff Industries, Inc. v. Elgin Medical Center, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Quaker Alloy Casting Co. v. Gulfco Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  4. Johnson v. FlueckigerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Smith v. JohnstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API