Legal Opinion
John H. Bailey v. Walter Redman, Warden, Delaware Correctional Center, and Richard R. Wier, Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 6, 1981No. 81-1156PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
In December, 1975, the appellant, John H. Bailey, was tried and convicted in a Delaware Superior Court for manslaughter. During his trial, the trial judge instructed the appellant not to discuss his testimony with anybody before the trial resumed the next day. Bailey now challenges that instruction as a denial of his sixth amendment right to counsel. Because we find that the appellant failed to demonstrate that he was deprived of his right to consult with counsel, we will affirm the district court’s judgment and deny Bailey’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
The facts…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Anthony Dilapi and Benjamin LadmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Aiello v. City of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- United States v. VenutoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by35 opinions
- Perry v. LeekeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sullivan v. CuylerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Haney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Barney Earl Crutchfield v. Louie L. Wainwright, Jim SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.