Legal Opinion

Niznik v. United States. Comodor v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 18, 1950No. 11122, 11123PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

These cases have been before this court on prior appeals in which judgments of conviction were reversed and the causes remanded for new trial. Niznik v. United States (Comodor v. United States), 173 F.2d 328. In our opinion, in which the facts relating to the controversy were fully set forth, we outlined certain uncontradicted testimony of appellants, stating that if such testimony on retrial should be substantially the same and undisputed, appellants would he entitled to acquittals.

On the retrial in which appellants were again convicted, their testimony was substantially the same, but…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Niznik v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard Secor Corliss, United States of America v. Fred August Heise, United States of America v. Walter HeroldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  2. Imboden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  3. United States v. Larry Deane SteplerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  4. United States v. Thomas Stewart AthertonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  5. United States v. Kenneth Ernest ChodorskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API