Kingsberry v. Chicago Title Insurance
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RONALD B. LEIGHTON, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the above-entitled Court on Defendant’s Motion to Amend Judgment [Dkt. # 55] and Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint [Dkt. # 57]. The Court has reviewed the materials submitted in support of, and in opposition to, each motion. Oral argument is not necessary to resolve the issues before the Court. For the following reasons, Defendant’s Motion to Amend Judgment [Dkt. # 55] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint [Dkt. # 57] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED PART.
DIS…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thorpe v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Blaylock v. First American Title InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2007
- Pain Diagnostics & Rehabilitation Associates, P.S. v. BrockmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Kingsberry v. Chicago Title InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2008
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hancock v. Chicago Title InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2009