Legal Opinion

State v. Carter

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 27, 2018No. 116223PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leben, J.:

*511 Tabitha Carter brought a Taser with her when she *512 robbed a Wichita Dollar General store. That led to her conviction for aggravated robbery under a statute that applies when the robber is "armed with a dangerous weapon." And it led to a requirement that she periodically register her residence with authorities under a statute that applies when a person "use[s]" a "deadly weapon" when committing a felony against a person. On appeal, Carter contests both her conviction and the registration requirement.

Carter argues that she wasn't armed with a dangerous weapon because a Taser isn't…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fils v. City of AventuraCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  2. State v. GodfreySupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  3. Estelle Smith v. Richard L. LePage, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  4. State v. PrinceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  5. State v. HanksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of Randolph v. City of WichitaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  2. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  3. State v. FordCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API