Legal Opinion

Barnhart v. Madvig

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1975PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, Justice.

This appeal is from an order of the Juvenile Court of Shelby County dismissing a paternity suit for lack of in personam jurisdiction over the alleged father.

Cherry Sue Barnhart filed a sworn petition naming Mark Robert Madvig as the father of her child and sought a decree of paternity and support against Mr. Madvig. The factual allegations of the petition in their entirety are as follows:

“1. Petitioner is a resident of Memphis, Shelby County, Tennessee. Defendant is a non-resident of the State of Tennessee and a resident of the State of Minnesota.
“2. The petitioner…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Poindexter v. WillisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  4. A.R.B. v. G.L.P.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  5. Gentry v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Larsen v. SchollSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  2. John Michael Pickens v. Richard and Patricia HessCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  3. Jones v. ChandlerMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Taylor v. Texas Department of Public WelfareCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Schilz v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR MARICOPA CTY.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API