Legal Opinion
In Re Telxon Corp. Securities Litigation
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 29, 2000No. 5:98-cv-02876PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
O’MALLEY, District Judge.
After being appointed Lead Plaintiffs, William Hayman and Arthur Hayman filed their Complaint against Telxon Corporation on September 30, 1999 for alleged violations of § 10(b) and § 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Telxon responded with a Motion to Dismiss (docket no. 15), contending that plaintiffs have failed to state with sufficient particularity a claim for securities fraud under Rule 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the heightened pleading requirements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act [“PSLRA”],…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Thor Power Tool Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Pr Diamonds, Inc. v. John P. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Wyser-Pratte Management Co., Inc. v. Telxon Corporation, Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- In Re Royal Ahold N v. Securities & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- Fidel v. FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Konkol v. Diebold, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.