Continental Casualty Co. v. Law Offices of Kaplan
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE HOFFMAN
delivered the opinion of the court:
The Law Offices of Melvin James Kaplan (Kaplan) appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of its malpractice insurance carrier, Continental Casualty Company (Continental), in Continental’s action seeking a judicial declaration that it has no duty to defend Kaplan in an action brought by one of its former clients, or to indemnify Kaplan from any judgment that might be entered in that action. Kaplan also appeals from the denial of its cross-motion for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the judgment of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Crum & Forster Managers Corp. v. Resolution Trust Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Estate of HooverIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- Carruthers v. B. C. Christopher & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Steadfast Insurance v. Caremark RX, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Donald T. Bertucci, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Erie Insurance Exchange v. Compeve CorporationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Midwest Gaming and Entertainment, LLC v. The County of CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Illinois Coin Machine Operators Ass'n v. County of CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.