Legal Opinion

Birkner v. Purdon

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1970No. Docket 7,191PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, P. J.

This is an action on an oral contract for the sale of Christmas trees. Plaintiff Birkner, a grower and wholesaler of scotch pines, sued to recover an unpaid purchase price due on the contract. Defendant Purdon, a lot-retailer, counterclaimed, alleging that the trees delivered did not meet contract requirements and were of inferior quality. The case was tried by the court sitting without a jury. From a judgment awarding defendant his counterclaim, plaintiff appeals.

At trial, defendant testified that he had ordered “Number One” trees — a designation generally used in the field of Christmas tree…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hubbardston Lumber Co. v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Sawyer & Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  3. Gridley v. Globe Tobacco Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Gongola v. YaksichMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Head v. Phillips Camper Sales & Rental, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Birou v. Thompson-Brown Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Sylvester v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. GNP Commodities, Inc. v. Walsh Heffernan Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. People v. CookMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API