Legal Opinion

Heyer v. Board of Supervisors

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1916No. Calendar No. 27,155PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Certiorari to Shiawassee; Miner, J. Mandamus by Louis G. Heyer against the Board of Supervisors of Shiawassee County to compel respondent to reconvene and order that the question of prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquors be submitted to the vote of the people. From an order denying the writ, relator brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.

The relator and appellant filed his petition in the circuit court for the county of Shiawassee for a writ of mandamus praying that the board of supervisors of said county be required to reconvene and determine, by resolution, that the question “Should the manufacture of liquors, and the liquor traffic, be prohibited within the county,” had been prayed for by a sufficient number of electors, and to submit said question to the electors of said county at the next regular spring election. An' order to show cause was granted, and the matter has been heard by the court upon the petition of relator,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Werstein v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anker v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API