Legal Opinion

224 East 18th Street Associates v. Sijacki

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided December 4, 1987PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bernard Fuchs, J.

The basis of this holdover proceeding is that respondent’s rent-controlled apartment is allegedly not her primary residence. At the threshold, respondent moves to dismiss the petition for lack of "subject matter jurisdiction”.

An offering statement or prospectus for conversion of the *495building to cooperative ownership was accepted for filing by the Attorney-General on May 28, 1987. The offering was on a noneviction basis and provided a 90-day period, now expired, during which tenants had an exclusive right to buy their respective apartments. Respondent has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. 58 West 58th Street Tenant Ass'n v. 58 West 58th Street AssociatesNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Tower 53 Associates v. BennettCivil Court of the City of New York · 1985
  3. Tower 53 Associates v. BennettAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sharp v. MelendezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API