Armour and Company v. Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Sutton.
We will refer to the plaintiff in error, Armour and Company, a self-insurer, as employer and to defendant in error as the Commission. The claimant will be referred to as such. When both the Commission and claimant are mentioned jointly we shall refer to them as the defendants in error.
Writ of error is directed to a judgment of the district court affirming the findings and award of the Commission in a proceeding arising under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The essential question for determination is whether the Commission exceeded its powers in excusing claimant’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. Newton Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Monks Excavating & Redi-Mix Cement v. KopsaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Denver v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, POLICE DEPT. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. FouldsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. StampfelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- City of Denver v. BushSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.