Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Treasurer, Second Injury Fund v. Coleman

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 13, 1985No. CA 85-136Published

1DissentTom Glaze, Judge

I respectfully dissent. Although the majority claims it reviewed the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commission’s decision, I suggest it actually gives no credence or weight to that evidence which supports the Commission’s findings.

The Court holds no substantial evidence exists to support the Commission’s finding, that Coleman’s first injury independently produced some degree of permanent disability both before and after his last injury. It further concludes, I believe inaccurately, that there is no evidence that Coleman sustained a loss of earning capacity due to his first injury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beasley v. ParnellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. Claim of Griego v. Griego Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. STATE TREASURER, SEC. INJURY FUND v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Claim of McCoy v. Perlite Concrete Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API