Wallace v. Merfeld
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.
This action was commenced by the defendants in error against the plaintiff in error to recover the sum of $385.65 as the unpaid portion of the purchase price of certain cattle. The parties will be hereinafter referred to as ■plaintiffs' and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court. Upon a trial -of the case judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs, from which defendant has appealed.
The defendant filed an answer containing allegations requiring a reply, and, the reply not having been filed within the time required by law, the defendant filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. Before…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fulsom-Morris Coal & Mining Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. FlingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ward v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Perry v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Keaton v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Merrick v. HomerDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1949