Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Merfeld

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 23, 1923No. 12160PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This action was commenced by the defendants in error against the plaintiff in error to recover the sum of $385.65 as the unpaid portion of the purchase price of certain cattle. The parties will be hereinafter referred to as ■plaintiffs' and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court. Upon a trial -of the case judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs, from which defendant has appealed.

The defendant filed an answer containing allegations requiring a reply, and, the reply not having been filed within the time required by law, the defendant filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. Before…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fulsom-Morris Coal & Mining Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. FlingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ward v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Perry v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Keaton v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Merrick v. HomerDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API