McCall v. Sustair
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal from Biggs, J., at May Term, 1911, of MegkleN-BTTRG-. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by Mr. Chief Justice Clark.
1Opinion of the Court
Claek, 0. J.
This is an action for slander, on an allegation that tbe defendant bad charged tbe plaintiff with stealing cotton, said charge having been made on three several occasions, viz., to John Cochrane, to L. A. Ferguson, and to Charles Simpson. Neither justification nor privilege was pleaded, but a denial of having charged the plaintiff with larceny.
*180Tbe issues submitted were:
“Did tbe defendant speak and publish of and concerning tbe plaintiff tbe alleged slanderous words set out in article 1 of tbe complaint witb tbe intent to thereby charge tbe plaintiff with tbe crime of larceny?”
This…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fields v. . BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Lucas v. . NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1859
- Hampton v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1834
- McBrayer v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1843
- Louder v. . HinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1857
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Flake Ex Rel. Flake v. Greensboro News Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Elmore v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Hall v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Elmore v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Vincent v. . PaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.