New York & Presbyterian Hospital v. Tishman Construction Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Herman Cahn, J.
Defendant Gordon Smith Consultants moves to dismiss the complaint (CPLR 3211 [a] [5]) as barred by the three-year Statute of Limitations for malpractice (CPLR 214 [6]). Plaintiff New York and Presbyterian Hospital (the Hospital) cross-moves to amend the caption to substitute the name “Gordon H. Smith Corporation” for that of defendant Gordon Smith Consultants.
In March 1986, Gordon H. Smith Corporation (Smith) agreed to serve as an “Exterior Walls Consultant” for the plaintiff Hospital on a “task assigned” basis. In a letter confirming the parties’ agreement,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Charlebois v. J.M. Weller Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Cubito v. KreisbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- People Ex Rel. Tower v. State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Scherrer v. Time Equities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Fink v. Regent Hotel, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gebhardt v. Allspect, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Wehrer v. Dynamic Life Therapy & Wellness, P.C.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019
- Wehrer v. Dynamic Life Therapy & WellnessNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
- Wehrer v. Dynamic Life Therapy & WellnessNebraska Supreme Court · 2019