Legal Opinion

Schlothan v. Rusalem

California Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1953No. L. A. 22650PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered upon motion of defendants pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 581, subdivision (3), which provides that “an action may be dismissed . . . when either party fails to appear on the trial and the other party appears and asks for the dismissal. ...” The determinative question is whether the trial court abused its discretion in ordering the dismissal of the action under the circumstances hereinafter set forth. Plaintiffs so contend and the record sustains their position.

The action (to reform a deed to real property in Palm Springs)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maynard v. BullisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. May v. RosenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Larson v. SolbakkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Cohen v. HerbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Givens v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Dingwall v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT CO., INC. v. ChagnonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API