Legal Opinion

Herren v. Shelnutt

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1926No. 7 Div. 252PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The summons and complaint named S.W. Herren and Wheeler Barker as individuals and as partners doing business under the firm names of Herren Barker and Barker Herren, and claimed against the individuals and against the two partnerships. Herren filed a special plea, denying the partnership. Issue being joined, the jury, after hearing the evidence, returned a verdict as follows:

"We, the jury, find the issue in favor of the plaintiff and against S.W. Herren as an individual, and against the partnership of Herren Barker and Barker Herren, and assess the damages at the sum of $274.25."

Upon this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pacific Mut. L. Ins. v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Tennessee Valley Bank v. Valley View FarmSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. General Accident, Fire & Life Ins. v. ShieldsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McKinstry v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Herren v. ShelnuttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API