Legal Opinion

Tide Water Pipe Line Co. v. Berry

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1890PublishedCited by 9 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of Supreme Court, see 23 Vroom 308.

1Opinion of the Court

*213The opinion of the court- was delivered by

Depue, J.

The prosecutor, a foreign corporation organized under the laws of Pennsylvania, is the owner of an iron pipe line, used for carrying crude petroleum from McKean county, Pennsylvania, to the Kill von Kull, at Bayonne, in this state. Its principal office is at Bayonne, in the county of Hudson, where the business of the company is' carried on.

The prosecutor was taxed for the year 1887 by the township of Woodbridge for seven miles of pipe laid in that township, extending across the township from Raritan township to the Rahway river.

The tax was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Dunkirk & Fredonia Railroad v. CassityNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. People Ex Rel. Citizens' Gas-Light Co. v. Board of AssessorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. Smith v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. People, Ex Rel. Muller v. . B'd of AssessorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. People Ex Rel. New York & Harlem Railroad v. Commissioners of Taxes & AssessmentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tewksbury Tp. v. Jersey Cent. Power & Light Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  2. Portland Terminal Co. v. HindsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1944
  3. Sinclair Refining Co. v. BurroughsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  4. Cumberland Pipe Line Co. v. LewisDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1926
  5. State v. Mayor of Asbury ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API