Legal Opinion · Dissent

Colgate Palmolive Co. v. S/S Dart Canada

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 14, 1983No. 24, Docket 83-7261Published

1DissentVan Graafeiland, Circuit Judge

The issue on this appeal, as I view it, is not whether appellant’s action against Global Terminal & Container Services, Inc. is within the federal maritime jurisdiction of the district court, but whether state or federal law controls when construing and applying the provisions of a bill of lading which was issued in interstate commerce. I believe that Congress has asserted its constitutionally accorded preeminence in this area and that federal law controls. See North Am. Phillips Corp. v. Emery Air Freight Corp., 579 F.2d 229, 233-34 (2d Cir.1978); Guinasso v. Pacific First Fed. Sav. & Loan…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & StahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Leather's Best, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. S.S. Mormaclynx, Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API