Legal Opinion

Russell Coleman v. Arthur Calderon, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 2, 2000No. 97-99013, 97-99014PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge DAVID R. THOMPSON; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BRUNETTI.

DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:

We reconsider this appeal on remand from the Supreme Court, Calderon v. Coleman, 525 U.S. 141, 119 S.Ct. 500, — L.Ed.2d - (1998), to determine whether an erroneous jury instruction given by the trial court was harmless. See Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 623, 113 S.Ct. 1710, 123 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993). After reconsideration, we conclude, under Brecht, that the instruction had a substantial and injurious effect on the jury’s verdict. Ac*1049cordingly, we affirm the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Gray v. NetherlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. United States v. Sean HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. John Thomas Drayden v. Theo White, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. William Charles Payton v. Jeanne Woodford, Warden, William Charles Payton v. Jeanne Woodford, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API