Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Barney v. Suggs

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 2, 1985No. 65980Published

1ConcurrenceDonnelly, Judge

The continued viability of Vonsmith:

The present disposition of this case necessarily reaffirms the principle that “a default judgment is not appealable in the absence of a motion to set aside or vacate.” Vonsmith v. Vonsmith, 666 S.W.2d 424 (Mo. banc 1984). See also Andrew County v. Owens, 46 Mo. 386, 388 (1870); Blackmore v. Blackmore, 639 S.W.2d 268, 269 (Mo.App.1982). While there is a lack of unanimity on the issue, this is the rule in numerous jurisdictions: “an appeal * * * will not lie in the first instance to reverse a judgment * * * entered against a party * * on his default, but the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Elfman v. Evanston Bus Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Lincoln Credit Co. v. PeachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. Bowman v. Kingsland Development, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Robbins v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. Adel v. ParkhurstWyoming Supreme Court · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API