Legal Opinion

James Fusco v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 2012No. 54A01-1204-CR-182Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: MARK SMALL GREGORY F. ZOELLER Indianapolis, Indiana Attorney General of Indiana ERIC P. BABBS Deputy Attorney General FILED Indianapolis, Indiana Dec 12 2012, 9:26 am IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA CLERK of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court JAMES FUSCO, ) ) Appellant-Defendant, ) ) vs. ) No.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kathleen K. Peterink v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Douglas Cottingham v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API