Legal Opinion

King v. Ickes

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 3, 1933No. 5612PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This appeal is from a final decree dismissing a bill for injunction to restrain the Secretary of the Interior from exercising authority or control over certain accumulated rents and royalties derived from a certain oil lease, inherited by appellant from a full-blood Indian allottee, in the state of Oklahoma, and for a mandatory order requiring the Secretary to release and turn over the funds to plaintiff or her guardian.

It appears that prior to 1919 one Pottey, a full-blood Seminole Indian, roll No. 1447, received as his homestead allotment, under the Aet of May…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Lone Wolf v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Sunderland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Brader v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Warren v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
  2. First Nat. Bank of Holdenville v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  3. United States v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  4. Ickes v. United States ex rel. PerryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
  5. Bond v. TomDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API