Legal Opinion

Ralph v. Wisner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Mandamus. Argued March 6, 1894. Granted May 4, 1894. Relators applied for mandamus to compel respondent to restore an order appointing a receiver for the Owosso & Corunna Street-Railway Company. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.

On October 15, 1891, the Owosso & Corunna ^Street-Railway Company issued its bonds in the sum of 140,000, payable in 20 years, with interest at 6 per cent., payable semi-annually. To secure the payment of the bonds it executed a mortgage upon its property, franchises, and effects to Matthias L. Stewart and Charles D. Stewart, trustees, which provided that, if the company should be in default in the payment of interest, and should remain in default for six months, the trustees *165should take possession, and, at the request of the majority ;n interest 'of the bondholders, sell the road at auction,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nusbaum v. ShaperoMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Wayne County Jail Inmates v. Wayne County Chief Executive OfficerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Petitpren v. Taylor School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Grand Rapids Trust Co. v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. City of KalamazooU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API