Legal Opinion

Graham Nat. Bank v. Beavers

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 6, 1926No. 11431Published

1Opinion

On Second Motion for Rehearing.

In opinion on motion for rehearing, we inadvertently and erroneously described the casing covered by the second chattel mortgage in controversy, and we now here withdraw the description of the property contained in 'the second mortgage, as shown in that opinion. The correct description of the property contained in the second mortgage is as follows:

t “Being 5,300 feet of 8-ineh casing, 1,311 feet o’f 10-inch casing, located on the Moran-Hughes and McLaren leases, casing on racks.”

The evidence shows that there were other leases in the same oil field, known as the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Continental Supply Co. v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of TexasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Maloney v. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Haslet State Bank v. CarperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API