Legal Opinion

Maxey v. City of East St. Louis

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 12, 1910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action in case for personal injuries. Appeal from the City Court of East St. Louis; the Hon. B. W. Pope, Judge, presiding. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Duncan

Appellee recovered against the appellant city a judgment of $1,800 for personal injuries received by her near the crossing of Missouri and Collinsville avenues in front of Kresse’s book-store in said city, August 29, 1908. The declaration charges that appellant negligently permitted a hole six inches deep, ten inches wide and thirty-six inches long to be and remain at said point on the north side of, and adjoining, the north rail of the north track of the East St. Louis Railway Company located on said street. The evidence shows that plaintiff was visiting relatives in said city and had never…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Greinke v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. City of Aurora v. HillmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Kohlhof v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. City of Beardstown v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Swift & Co. v. RennardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Deren v. City of CarbondaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  2. Margolis v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Brolin v. the City of IndependenceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Welch v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  5. Peters v. RiggsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API