Legal Opinion
Center for Biological Diversity v. Norton
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 1, 2002No. 3:01-cv-02145Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER SETTING TIMELINE ON REMAND
GONZALEZ, District Judge.
Pursuant to the May 9, 2002 joint stipulation for consolidation and remand, the parties to these consolidated cases briefed the Court on the appropriate timeline for new critical habitat determinations for the Peirson’s milk-vetch, Lane Mountain milk-vetch, Fish Slough milk-vetch, San Jacinto crownseale, Spreading Navarretia, Munz’s Onion, Coachella Valley milk-vetch, and Thread-leaved brodiaea. Plaintiff Center for Biological Diversity and California Native Plant Society’s proposed timeline would provide the Service one to two years to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- National Wildlife Federation, Great Bear Foundation v. Burlington Northern Railroad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- New Mexico Cattle Growers Ass'n v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Forest Guardians v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Biodiversity Legal Foundation v. BadgleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Conservation Council for Hawai'i v. BabbittDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1998